You missed the foundation of Ronda Rousey’s argument. Rousey pointed out that Kim K’s fame seems to have originated with, and been built upon, the release of a sex tape. Not a lot of hard work there, don’t you agree? In contrast, Rousey built her fame during fourteen long years of hard work. Work that requires rare ability and determination.
There are about 530 members of the 2012 U.S. Olympic Team of which 238 are returning. The U.S. Population is 300,000,000, so do the math. Most of us simply don’t have what it takes to match Ronda Rousey’s accomplishments. Rousey’s choice of words may seem less than refined at times, but can you fight at her skill level? You implied that you know more about the proper thought processes of a fighter in training than does an Olympian. What is the source of your implied expertise? From my couch, it appears that you’re not even above average in your chosen profession (writer/teacher).
In summary your editorial is filled with both formal and informal fallacies; the inevitable result of arguing from a conclusion with an eye on sensationalism. Thomas Jefferson said that “the most truthful part of a newspaper is the advertisements.” Your advertisement says that you don’t like Ronda Rousey because you think that she is vulgar. If that is the case then argue that issue, don’t cleverly try to diminish Rousey’s accomplishments with a crappy article.

Sincerely,
Brad Roberts